<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The standards of blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and analysis on the San Diego Padres (and the rest of baseball)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Myron</title>
		<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Rick, no, it didn&#039;t seem like he read the article.

It&#039;s a strange subject (bloggers vs. MSM) ... on one hand, I&#039;m sick of the &#039;controversy&#039; and think it&#039;s pretty pointless. On the other, it is interesting to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, no, it didn&#8217;t seem like he read the article.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a strange subject (bloggers vs. MSM) &#8230; on one hand, I&#8217;m sick of the &#8216;controversy&#8217; and think it&#8217;s pretty pointless. On the other, it is interesting to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Rosenthal even read the actual blog posting. He comes off as seeming like he just read the Philly Inquirer article only. 

It was indeed a &quot;we are professionals&quot; and you are just a &quot;lowly blogger&quot; conversation though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Rosenthal even read the actual blog posting. He comes off as seeming like he just read the Philly Inquirer article only. </p>
<p>It was indeed a &#8220;we are professionals&#8221; and you are just a &#8220;lowly blogger&#8221; conversation though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myron</title>
		<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Good stuff at The Book Blog: http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/jerod_morris/

I like Tango&#039;s take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff at The Book Blog: <a href="http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/jerod_morris/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/jerod_morris/</a></p>
<p>I like Tango&#8217;s take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myron</title>
		<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I thought Rosenthal came of looking the worst there. The blogger really handled himself well, and argued his points nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I thought Rosenthal came of looking the worst there. The blogger really handled himself well, and argued his points nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin Nieves</title>
		<link>http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin Nieves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpadresblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/the-standards-of-blogging/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Rosenthal looks like an ass on this one. He&#039;s saying that there are some topics that nobody is ever allowed to write about, now matter how much evidence you use or how fair you are. 

The idea that some stuff can never ever ever ever be talked about, even if you&#039;re even keeled about it, is outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosenthal looks like an ass on this one. He&#8217;s saying that there are some topics that nobody is ever allowed to write about, now matter how much evidence you use or how fair you are. </p>
<p>The idea that some stuff can never ever ever ever be talked about, even if you&#8217;re even keeled about it, is outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
