You may remember last year I tracked fielding performance through the season with the numbers available at The Hardball Times. You can find a pretty good primer here.
There’s still some nuanced debate about the best way to calculate things, mostly revolving around estimating out of zone chances, but for now I’m sticking with the same method as last year. Over the next few days, weeks, however long it takes me, we’ll run through the seven positions (I leave out pitcher and there are no stats for catcher).
Let’s start with shortstop (total runs above average):
Top 5
| Player |
Team |
RAA |
| Ryan |
STL |
+12.7 |
| Bartlett |
TB |
+10.9 |
| Andrus |
TEX |
+9.1 |
| Scutaro |
TOR |
+7.5 |
| Wilson |
PIT |
+7.2 |
Bottom 5
| Player |
Team |
RAA |
| Betancourt |
SEA |
-16.2 |
| Tejada |
HOU |
-9.3 |
| Guzman |
WAS |
-8.8 |
| Cabrera |
OAK |
-8.4 |
| Lugo |
BOS |
-7.4 |
The two main caveats are the usual ones. To judge a player with fielding stats, you probably want to use years of data, not a couple of months. Two, this stat particularly — and all fielding stats in general — is not the end-all-be-all. The two kind of tie together in that the uncertainty in measuring fielding requires much more data than offense or pitching.
Anyway, this is just a fun early season glimpse. I think the early numbers pass the ‘smell test,’ with some expected players showing up in the top (Bartlett, Andrus, Wilson) and the bottom 5 (Betancourt, Lugo, Guzman). Let’s check out the Padres:
| Player |
Innings |
RAA |
| Rodriguez |
287 |
-4.7 |
| Burke |
184 |
-5 |
| Wilson |
106 |
-5.5 |
| Cabrera |
33 |
-.9 |
Ouch. Wilson has been really bad, but the others not much better. Overall, –16 runs in the early going. Khalil Greene, by the way, was –1.1 before going to the DL in St. Louis.
One thing that kind of bugged me is that a lot of people dismissed these numbers when MGL released his UZR to FanGraphs. I understand the notion: why use a clearly inferior fielding stat when a better one is available? I think it’s a good idea to use as many numbers as possible, if the stat is reasonable in its construction. While this stat is not that detailed, not nearly as much so as UZR, I still think it could add some value. Let’s briefly compare the two stats on the guys listed above:
| Player |
RAA |
UZR |
| Ryan |
+12.7 |
+7 |
| Bartlett |
+10.9 |
+1 |
| Andrus |
+9.1 |
+6.7 |
| Scutaro |
+7.5 |
+4.5 |
| Wilson |
+7.2 |
+6.5 |
| Betancourt |
-16.2 |
-9.6 |
| Tejada |
-9.3 |
-7 |
| Guzman |
-8.8 |
-5 |
| Cabrera |
-8.4 |
-5.2 |
| Lugo |
-7.4 |
-5.3 |
| Rodriguez |
-4.7 |
-3 |
| Burke |
-5 |
-2.8 |
| Wilson |
-5.5 |
-1.1 |
| Cabrera |
-.9 |
-.1 |
UZR is a little more conservative, but the numbers follow each other pretty nicely. Of course, that’s to be expected, at least to a degree, as both numbers use the same data set (Baseball Info Solutions).
Comparing 14 players through two and a half months certainly isn’t convincing, and it isn’t meant to be, but it at least shows that the THT numbers are in the ballpark. Anyway, my point is not to endorse the THT numbers Fred McGriff style, rather to just report them throughout the season, as a fun, perhaps occasionally enlightening exercise.
Oh, yeah, the Padres could use some fielding at short, especially when the current set of shortstops is hitting .208/.303/.292
Recent Comments